Ok so other than workflow during editing and the UI there are a few other features that are worth talking about. This is really helpful when you're making and posting multiple revisions. On the UI front, Camtasia has a nice interface for 'sharing' videos that includes a "Share History" dialog - this is a really nice feature, especially when sharing to you tube as it keeps a copy of the link for each video. This doesn't help in the 'which tool has technical superiority' question, but it could help some users choose Camtasia over Screenflow if they are in an environment that would benefit from cross platform compatibility (ie most of the fortune 500) I'm sure you're aware that Camtasia is now cross platform and includes a license for both, whereas Screenflow is mac only. If you've used other video editors, Screenflow would be favorable, it supports "JKL" key navigation of it's timeline and seems to have a few shortcuts that would make editing faster for someone who's memorized the shortcuts and gotten semi proficient. On the other hand if you make a video each day, you would learn how screenflow does that, so your time spent googling would be limited to your first few videos. This is my opinion only, but I feel like Camtasia is a better tool if you only make a video once in a while - I can always do what I need in Camtasia without googling how to do it. Camtasia puts a bunch of functionality right in front of you. You accomplish mainly the same thing in both tools, but the editing experience is drastically different. To me the main difference is in the user interface. If one was, then we'd have a clear 'best' program and a decision would be easy.īoth programs do the core functionality of recording and editing a basic screencast. Neither program is perfect unfortunately. (ie spending a little each year vs buying a bigger upgrade every few years) Camtasia releases paid updates every few years, and lots of free 'point' upgrades in between (just look at version 2 you own now, it's on 2.10.8 the 10th free update) I mention this because it's easier to think one tool is cheaper than another, but I suspect that the average yearly cost is about the same. I'll try to point out some differences I've observed over the years. I own both programs and for the most part, you can't go wrong with either one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |